Let’s Play the Feud

February 3, 2008

mccain_romney.jpg

After a week of the press drooling over the possibility of an all-out Obama v Clinton brawl, the candidates decided to end the nastiness and debate nice just in time for super Tuesday [NPR]. So now, it’s the Republicans’ turn [Bostonist].

What’s interesting is that you don’t hear anyone among the candidates, their surrogates, or the press calling for McCain and Romney to chill out, end the bitterness and focus on the issues.  The Dems got a lot of that, but everyone seems content to watch the Republican front runners duke it out - particularly the Republican front-runners. The LA Times looks at the historical roots of this battle:

 On Sept. 19, 2000, John McCain rose in the Senate to rail against what he called the “staggering” sums that the federal government planned to spend to help Salt Lake City stage the 2002 Winter Olympics…

Mitt Romney, who headed the Olympics, counseled calm when reporters from Utah’s Deseret Morning News reached him in Sydney, Australia. Romney challenged McCain’s arithmetic, arguing that taxpayers would provide only $250 million…

The clash over Olympics spending, which dragged on for two years, helps explain some of the acrimony that now characterizes the race between the two front-runners for the Republican presidential nomination. The dispute provided an early preview of the fissures that still divide McCain and Romney as they face what may be decisive contests Tuesday.

“It may be a source of the sniping between the two,” said Quin Monson, assistant director of the Center for Elections and Democracy at Romney’s alma mater, Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah. Kelly Patterson, the center’s director, agreed: “People have long memories in politics.”

This piece is on the right track, though it needs to be a lot longer. The context of the ‘02 Olympic feud only underscores the futility of Romney’s amnuition against McCain - the former Mass. Governor wants America to believe that Washington is the problem in this country, while his opponent represents nothing of the sort [washingtonpost.com, Zachary Goldfarb]:

For his part, Romney belittled McCain’s endorsements, saying, “I know that the political establishment is going to try and pull for John McCain, but I expect that I’m going to get the support of the people.”

As if McCain needed a reason to dislike Romney more.

So let the Democrats touch, feel, and unite - Romney/McCain will continue to get nasty right through Tuesday’s polls. Oh, and don’t forget about the Huckster, he’s making a great fan for the flames and a great surrogate for McCain [Conservative Pulse]:

Huckabee is someone who has been known to hold the occassional grudge and he feels badly burned by the brass knuckles campaign that Mitt Romney ran in Iowa.  By staying in the race, Huckabee is drawing votes that might otherwise go to Romney.  And if he stays in the race until Wednesday, Huckabee will be able to help tip things to McCain.

Huckabee would like to be Vice-President and all signs suggest McCain would like having him on the ticket.  The two men get along well and have a great deal of respect for each other.


Ron Paul’s Series of Tubes

February 1, 2008

More endorsements: TechCrunch backs Obama and McCain. An interesting one though, because the uber-geek site invited its readers to vote for the ‘tech candidate’ and Ron Paul, despite not being interviewed as part of the website’s series, won big on the republican side. To TechCrunch’s credit, they resisted the vocal minority and did not endorse Dr. Paul who, as I’ve said before, really can not match his supporters when it comes to web savvy.

Now, to his credit, Paul initiated a retro-interview and attempted to deliver a more nuanced view on net neutrality. But look closely at his words Paulites: your man is not exactly straight-talking. And beyond the circular reasoning, the dr. had time to figure this net-neutrality thing out and convey and actual understanding of an actual issue (as opposed to an unrealistic stance on a non-issue, which is Paul’s usual tact):

So it’s something I really struggle with and hope that I can come up with something that is practical and also consistent with my philosophy that you don’t resort to government regulation, because I want to be very consistent. I don’t want the government involved in the internet and I don’t want taxes on internet. And I may not understand everything I have to about the internet, but I do know one thing. That we can’t allow the government intrusion into the internet, because there has even been moves on for international controls and international taxation and to me it’s a saving grace.

Surprise, surprise, TechCrunch received 300 + comments in response to its failure to endorse Paul, the readers’ pick. Just like their candidate, the Paulites aren’t really interested in engaging on the issues on an analytical level.


So Long Suckers

January 31, 2008

Both Rudy Giuliani [NBC News] and John Edwards [Washingtonpost.com] dropped out of the race today. A year ago, I would have named each of these men as their respective party’s most electable candidate. Turns out, neither one campaigned as their party (or at least the voters) expected: Giuliani didn’t give a damn and Edwards gave too much of a damn.

I don’t think there’s much of a question around whose endorsement is worth more to the recipient - that would be Giuliani - but it will be more interesting to see who Edwards will endorse, if anyone. Meanwhile, I think a McCain endorsement out of Giuliani is a good bet.

Update: Turns out Giuliani endorsed McCain during his concessions speech [Financial Times]. And with Rudy out of the race, apparently McCain is the only “American hero” left and he’s got the former Mayor and even Arnie on his side to prove it:

After announcing his exit, Mr Giuliani said Mr McCain was “the most qualified candidate” to be president, describing him as someone who could be “trusted in times of crisis”.

Mr McCain said he was honoured to have won the support of an “American hero”, referring to Mr Giuliani’s leadership of New York after the September 11 attacks, and vowed to use him as a “strong right arm” in tackling terrorism.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, the governor of California, is expected on Thursday to endorse Mr McCain, aides to the Arizona senator were reported as saying, adding momentum to his campaign.

Mr Schwarzenegger recently told the Financial Times that Mr McCain was an “action hero” who had proved he could cope with the pressure of being ­president. “In the end, when people go in the voting booth, those are the things they carry with them in there. They don’t remember so much all the policies,” he said.


A Win’s Not Always a Win

January 30, 2008

Some updates:

Most media outlets are declaring a win for McCain in Florida [Washington Post]. I’m waiting for concession spam from Floridians for Immigration Enforcement.

Meanwhile, the Hillary Clinton Media Outlet is declaring victory for HRC and washingtonpost.com’s Dana Milbank is not amused:

 But in a political stunt worthy of the late Evel Knievel, the Clinton campaign decided to put on an ersatz victory party that, it hoped, would erase memories of Obama’s actual victory in South Carolina’s Democratic primary. “Thank you Florida Democrats!” Clinton shouted to the cheering throng. “I am thrilled to have this vote of confidence.”

Honestly though, what is she suppose to do? I’m pretty sure this whole primary dates mess is not the Clintons’ fault (thought my staff is factchecking) and it’s important Democrats across the nation understand the level of support HRC has in such a key state, so can you blame her?

And an update on the importance of a Sebelius endorsement for Obama following her rebuttal last night…just check out the comments section and you’ll understand that her star didn’t exactly continue its rise [HuffingtonPost.com]. And I’d have to agree, Obama is still the next Obama.


Spamming For Closed Borders and Closed Minds

January 29, 2008

Today’s Republican primary is big. Crucial for some [AP], life or death for others [Baltimore Sun]. Which would explain why some interest groups are turning to spam to get the dirtiest messages across:

Floridians  for  Immigration  Enforcement

AMNESTY Truth Express On the Move

FL East Coast Report:

Thanks to the folks who helped with the Florida East Coast AMNESTY Truth Express.  We were able to hand out many amnesty information flyers, show the “McCain=AMNESTY” sign on the van to many and provide live reports to three talk radio shows.

No, I was not in Jacksonville over the weekend protesting John McAmnesty, but apparently Floridians for Immigration Enforcement wanted to thank me with a spam-mail anyway. You know, in order to heighten the debate:

Senator McAMNESTY has appointed a former Mexican Cabinet official as a Director in his campaign!  And this is the new McCain who professes immigration enforcement#$%@?  McCain for President —- of Mexico!

More Multiculturalism:

Actually, this is more like transnationalism. A reader alerted me to the fact that McCain’s “Hispanic Outreach Director” is the same guy who held that job for Mexico’s President Vicente Fox!

…Demonstrators Needed for SW FL:

Sen. McCain and illegal immigration:

But this has not been the case with his disingenuous blustering on illegal immigration - particularly when his cosponsorship of mass-amnesty legislation with Sen. Edward Kennedy is raised.

Mel Martinez to endorse McCain!

Ah, nothing like a little last minute campaign-bigotry.


Wrestling With Pigs

January 24, 2008

I said it once, and the New York Times will say it again for me: it’s not just politics, the Republican candidates don’t like Romney. Yes, this is, in many ways, a junior high popularity contest:

“The glee the other candidates go after Romney with is really unique…”

“They think he didn’t pay his dues…”

“John McCain and his friends used to beat up Mitt Romney at recess…”

And Romney’s locker-room style defense:

A spokesman for the Romney campaign, Kevin Madden, said, “I think it’s largely driven by the fact that everybody’s taught to tackle the guy on the field with the ball.”

Please. McCain’s venom for Romney was strongest when he had already stripped the ball from the former Massachusetts Governor. Romney has a distinctly different approach to the veteran politician. Mitt knows the rules well, but he’s use to playing in a totally different arena, a totally different sport than McCain, Huckabee and Thompson. I’d bet that even Romney’s staff end up drinking alone while everybody else is joking about them at the bar next-door…

“Never get into a wrestling match with a pig,” Senator John McCain said in New Hampshire this month after reporters asked him about Mr. Romney. “You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.”


John McCain, a youthful 71

January 20, 2008

Plenty of coverage to chew on today for the junkies after a bit of a wild ride yesterday. McCain’s win in South Carolina was huge and that’s a big story, but no one is talking about how poorly he did in Nevada. I mean, I understand the Mormon component, I know he didn’t dedicate much in the way of resources, and I’ll concede that Nevada Republicans are an eccentric bunch, but can anyone explain how he managed to lose to Ron Paul? I realize it’s Nevada - and I was just there: the enthusiasm for Paul was palpable - but can’t McCain manage something for being a Southwestern maverick?

The questions remain, but here’s an interesting strategy from the McCain camp in an attempt to connect with young voters: bring your daughter along on the campaign trail and give her a camera and a blog [UK Sunday Times]. John McCain’s daughter Meghan - check that, “hot” daughter according to the web nerdorati - has her own crew as well and provides an in-depth look into the campaign trail. Apparently it involves a lot of waiting around and is hell on your hair (thanks, C).meghan-mccain.jpg

[Photo Credit: Meghan McCain]


Back To Issues

January 15, 2008

The optimists view of today’s extra-curricular fracas between Obama and Clinton [PBS News Hour MP3 Download]: the media (and, to a lesser degree, voters) are eager to differentiate between these candidates.

Now, back to the issues:

Solid analysis of the “globalization and technology” policies of the candidates who have won primaries so far from Information Week blogger Mary Hayes Weier:

Obama and Huckabee

Clinton and McCain

Not much in the way of insight, but she covers the breadth of what these candidates have presented thus far.


Somebody Needs a Time-Out

January 9, 2008

I was concerned we were going to see a tv first last night and one of the commentators may actually have to take a breath for a second amidst grandstanding about “the most incredible primary comeback in history!” I heard drivel like this way too much last night, but I think Gideon Rachman presents a much more realistic take with his sobering “Maybe These Things Are Simply Hard To Predict” FT blog post.

So the Democratic race is officially interesting but analysts are already starting to ignore the Republican race, which was interesting from the start and only got more so last night. I can’t understand why anyone thinks Romney was ‘embarrassed’ last night: New Hampshire is its own beast, it may be New England, but it was not home court for Romney.

That’s not to say the former Massachusetts Governor shouldn’t be concerned.  Here’s what I glean from the Boston Globe’s handy interactive exit polling tool:

  •  Most Republican voters in NH who are concerned about the economy voted for McCain - that hurts.
  • Voters identify Romney with GW Bush - wonder if that’s probably not a good thing right now (definitely not in NH) but one that might be corrected by inevitable rise of Giuliani.
  • McCain won out on electibility - again, Romney should be concerned because McCain isn’t exactly a Republican-establishment candidate, shouldn’t be too hard to convince voters Romney is more electable…
  • Which brings us to the promising news for Romney: he won among registered Republicans and those who identified as Conservative (Independents boosted McCain).

The last data-point speaks to the uniqueness of the Granite State (and  its process) and should serve as promising for Romney. Of course, if Romney loses Michigan to McCain by more than a couple points, he should probably shift from concerned to panicked.


Lull Before the Who Knows What

December 17, 2007

Not a whole lot of inspiration from the Sunday papers today. You get the sense that the candidates tried to plant a few seeds last week (Huckabee w/ the Mormon-baiting; Hillary camp w/ the drug comments; Bill w/ the “lack of experience” comments) and everyone’s just waiting around to see what sprouts. Will be interested to see if Obama joins in - kind of get the feeling that he’s better off just dancing in the ring instead of throwing punches. Speaking of which - it’s difficult to imagine Mike Huckabee getting through this week without taking a few shots.

The other interesting storyline will continue to be endorsements. McCain and Hillary got the DesMoines Register and word is McCain will get Joe Lieberman as well. This isn’t a huge boost for the Arizona Senator so much as it should serve as a reminder to the media, and perhaps the voters of New Hampshire, that he’s still alive. And something tells me, sadly, that you can’t count out Fred Thompson either. No link, just a gut thing. By this time next week I would hope there’s more than that to go on.